There is a scene in Reversing the Drift I keep coming back to. A man named Mark sits in the same coffee shop most mornings. The TV runs in the corner. He nods along the way you nod along to a weather report. His pastor says something similar on Sunday. His friends say it at the table. By the time Mark repeats it himself, it does not feel like an opinion anymore. It feels like a fact he has always known.
Then one morning the woman wiping down the counter says, without looking up, “Funny how leaders tell you who they are long before we notice.”
Mark does not argue. He sits there holding a coffee gone cold, realizing he has never checked a single thing.
I want to be careful here, because it would be easy to make Mark sound foolish. He is not. What happened to him is one of the steadiest findings in psychology.
Researchers call it the illusory truth effect. In 1977, Lynn Hasher and her colleagues had people rate statements as true or false across several sessions. The statements that got repeated were rated as more true, whether or not they actually were. Repetition alone moved the needle. Later studies found the effect held even when people already knew better.
The reason is not stupidity. It is efficiency. Your brain uses ease as a shortcut for truth. A claim you have heard fifty times is easy to process, and easy feels familiar, and familiar feels true. Add a confident voice and the pull gets stronger, because we also treat confidence as a rough stand-in for accuracy. Someone who sounds certain saves us the work of finding out.
That is not a flaw you can lecture your way out of. I spent decades sitting across from people as a counselor, and I still catch myself doing it. I will be halfway through repeating something on a long walk, out past the last streetlight in Indiana, and stop mid-sentence: where did I actually get that?
Which brings me to the question I would ask if we were sitting together.
Was there ever a moment when you trusted someone’s confidence more than you checked their facts?
Not as an accusation. As an inventory. Everyone has one. Mine involve people I loved and admired.
The useful part is what comes next. You do not have to become a fact-checking machine, or distrust everyone who ever sounded sure. You only have to add one small question to the ones you already ask. Not “is this true,” which puts everybody on the defensive, but “where did this come from, and have I ever actually looked?”
That question is not disloyalty. It is the beginning of getting your own mind back. In the book I call curiosity a quiet act of courage, and I mean that plainly. It costs something to ask.
If this landed, the book goes deeper into how decent, intelligent people drift, and how they find the way back. Not to a party. Not to a label. To themselves.
For more content like this, get Reversing the Drift on Amazon → amazon.com/dp/B0FXYPSPZQ